<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Createquity.Createquity.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://createquity.com/search/label/AFTA/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://createquity.com</link>
	<description>The most important issues in the arts...and what we can do about them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:17:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s beat this recession together</title>
		<link>https://createquity.com/2009/07/lets-beat-this-recession-together/</link>
		<comments>https://createquity.com/2009/07/lets-beat-this-recession-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian David Moss]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://createquity.com/2009/07/lets-beat-this-recession-together.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(photo credit: henrybloomfield, flickr Creative Commons license) You know, for a long time I resisted incorporating the current economic environment into my writing here, other than brief references to it in the around the horn posts, mostly because I didn’t feel like I had any brilliant answers. Yeah, it sucks that no one has any<a href="https://createquity.com/2009/07/lets-beat-this-recession-together/" class="read-more">Read&#160;More</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jSTeDrbLy7I/Sl9oYp4MOCI/AAAAAAAAAVM/8OwppEHLEnw/s1600-h/3441488033_8c01b13680_o.jpg"><img decoding="async" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jSTeDrbLy7I/Sl9oYp4MOCI/AAAAAAAAAVM/8OwppEHLEnw/s400/3441488033_8c01b13680_o.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5359116854361864226" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:78%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">(photo credit: </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/henrybloomfield/3441488033/">henrybloomfield</a><span style="font-style: italic;">, flickr Creative Commons license)</span></span></div>
<p>You know, for a long time I resisted incorporating the current economic environment into my writing here, other than brief references to it in the <a href="https://createquity.com/search/label/around%20the%20horn">around the horn posts</a>, mostly because I didn’t feel like I had any brilliant answers. Yeah, it sucks that no one has any money and everybody’s cutting back. No, we don’t really have a lot of control over the situation. So why talk about it? But at the <a href="https://createquity.com/search/label/AFTA">AFTA Convention</a> last month, I started to realize that there’s a very palpable need out there to look for answers, even if we’re not sure where (or whether) we’ll find them. So in the spirit of Web 2.0, here’s what I’m going to propose: let’s crowdsource this thing. Let’s get all the information we have, collectively, on the table, and start thinking about what we can do as a field and as individuals to turn this ship around. If you have something to contribute, do so in the comments and I will respond to selected ones in future posts in order to keep the conversation going and shine a light on your ideas.</p>
<p>Though it’s tempting to start by thinking about this from the perspective of an individual organization or person, I want to urge everyone at the beginning to take a very broad view of the situation, thinking about the pressures and opportunities that the current environment is creating. Once we have a good handle on that, our thoughts about individual situations will be much better informed because we can place them in context.</p>
<p>So, without further ado, here are some thoughts on the big picture to get us started. These are in no particular order.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">This recession is much bigger than any of us or all of us put together.</span><br />The biggest thing to keep in mind about the recession, I think, is that we didn’t cause it, so therefore we can’t really fix it by ourselves. (By ourselves, I mean as an arts field.) However, that doesn’t mean we don’t have any power. We can help ourselves by becoming much more involved at a political level and working to support policies that will help everyone, not just artists, much as many artists got involved at the Obama campaign last year. Follow what’s going on in Congress. There are some pretty sweeping changes under consideration that could have big implications for the future, the most obvious being health care reform, the energy bill, and consideration of a second stimulus package. The outcome of those discussions could very easily mean far more for the arts than the next food fight over the NEA budget or Kal Penn’s new role at the White House.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">There’s going to be some contraction.</span><br />If economies <a href="https://createquity.com/2009/07/economics-and-true-meaning-of-value.html">can grow</a>, they can also shrink, and this one is shrinking. With the total number of nonprofits continuing to increase, there is inevitably going to be some attrition. From a system perspective, if this is inevitable, we want to make sure that this happens in the way that makes the best sense for everyone. To do this, we need to ask ourselves who the arts are really for. Is it the artists? Is it wealthy, educated audiences? At-risk kids? Everyone? Well-traveled international orchestra conductors and executive-level administrators? Following the money, you would think it’s the last group.</p>
<p>Most observers seem to agree that it’s the mid-level organizations that are going to be hit the hardest. I don’t know whether that’s accurate, but let’s assume that is for the sake of argument. Does this mean that mid-level organizations are overcapitalized? Do there need to be as many of them as they are? Or does it mean that small and large organizations are (or will be) overvalued?</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">We all know what the pressures are. Where are the opportunities?</span><br />Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so do markets. Let’s take a look at where the opportunities lie in this recession.</p>
<ol>
<li>This is a <span style="font-weight: bold;">GREAT</span> time to hire. A lot of people are out of work right now, but that doesn’t mean there’s any less talent or experience in the labor force than there was before. You have access to quite a few people in this market who wouldn’t have been available in a different time.</li>
<li>This is a great time to <span style="font-weight: bold;">SPEND MONEY</span>. If you’re one of the lucky few to actually have money to burn in this economy, <span style="font-style: italic;">don’t sit on it!</span> Everything is cheap right now, from real estate to services to stuff you buy at the mall. There’s not likely to be another opportunity again anytime soon when your dollar can buy so much, and as a bonus you’ll be doing your patriotic duty. And by the way, this goes for foundations too: buying impact is no less cheap for them. So consider dipping into those endowments, or even spending them down: trust, there will be plenty of people ready to carry on the legacy once things improve.</li>
<li>This is a great time to <span style="font-weight: bold;">START SOMETHING NEW</span>. Again, there’s a lot of talent, a lot of time, and a lot of energy floating around out there that wasn’t out there before. That lends itself well to entrepreneurship, new ideas, new collaborations, new possibilities. Things will be tough at first, but you’ll also be facing a lot less competition now than you would in a more prosperous time.</li>
</ol>
<p>Another opportunity is to make more intensive use of resources that are available to you at <span style="font-weight: bold;">no marginal cost</span>. (Meaning free, to the non-economically inclined.) Because there’s not as much cash floating around, and (some) people have more time, those resources become more valuable to you. I’m thinking about things like the Internet in general, social media, blogs, free events or workshops, and so forth.</p>
<p>That should be a decent start, but I’m sure I haven’t captured everything. What other large-scale implications can we think of for the recession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://createquity.com/2009/07/lets-beat-this-recession-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Around the horn: Sotomayor edition</title>
		<link>https://createquity.com/2009/07/around-horn-sotomayor-edition/</link>
		<comments>https://createquity.com/2009/07/around-horn-sotomayor-edition/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian David Moss]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[around the horn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://createquity.com/2009/07/around-the-horn-sotomayor-edition.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, &#8220;sustainability&#8221; is definitely the word of the month. It was plastered all over the recent Americans for the Arts Convention, my own treatment of the subject was linked by jazz blogs everywhere (thanks, Darcy) and is now the top-read Createquity post of all-time, and now this week two bloggers have given it their own<a href="https://createquity.com/2009/07/around-horn-sotomayor-edition/" class="read-more">Read&#160;More</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Wow, &#8220;sustainability&#8221; is definitely the word of the month. It was plastered all over the recent <a href="https://createquity.com/search/label/AFTA">Americans for the Arts Convention</a>, my <a href="https://createquity.com/2009/06/on-arts-and-sustainability.html">own treatment of the subject</a> was linked by jazz blogs everywhere (thanks, <a href="http://secretsociety.typepad.com">Darcy</a>) and is now the top-read Createquity post of all-time, and now this week two bloggers have given it their own take. Holden Karnofsky takes a look at sustainability from a theory-of-change perspective: what does it mean for <a href="http://blog.givewell.net/?p=397">an organization to pursue sustainable change</a>? This essay makes me think, once again, about how different the arts are from other charitable causes. For the most part, we&#8217;re not really about eradicating problems. The arts&#8217; <span style="font-style: italic;">raison-d&#8217;etre</span> is fundamentally positive rather than negative in orientation &#8211; looking at possibilities rather than deficiencies. Meanwhile, Guy Yedwab considers sustainability <a href="http://culturefuture.blogspot.com/2009/07/sustainability-i-secretary-general.html">from an organizational leadership perspective</a>, defining a sustainable organization as one that has set up processes such that new heads can &#8220;graduate&#8221; from within when old ones leave. It&#8217;s clear we have a ways to go before we can all agree on what we mean by the term.</li>
<li>Well, as far as economic sustainability is concerned, Scott Walters reposted <a href="http://lessthan100k.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/from-the-past-on-william-j-baumol-and-the-cost-disease/">an earlier essay</a> this past week on that old chestnut, Baumol and Bowen&#8217;s <span style="font-style: italic;">Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma</span>, and makes the case that we have adjusted our cost structure to the subsidized spoils available to us. Walters also gets this week&#8217;s <span style="font-weight: bold;">BLOGGER ON FIRE</span> award for a <a href="http://lessthan100k.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/knowing-the-numbers/">new project</a> to pull together what data we have on the arts into one place, and this essay <a href="http://lessthan100k.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/100-years-ago/">on the necessary centrality of participation in arts policy</a>.</li>
<li>But hey, who needs money when you can have <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010110.html">attention</a>? (h/t <a href="http://giarts.wordpress.com/2009/07/12/heres-a-model-for-the-cultural-sector-attention-philanthropy/">GIA blog</a>) After all, according to Nielsen Soundscan, <a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/stories/070809howmany/view">fewer than 6%</a> of all new albums released in 2008 sold as many as 1,000 copies (and that&#8217;s just counting the albums that were official enough to be listed with Soundscan!). Given the winner-take-all nature of arts markets, Richard Florida predicts we&#8217;ll soon see a celebrity <a href="http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2009/07/08/the-end-of-celebrity/">even bigger than Michael Jackson</a>. (By the way, it&#8217;s much easier to be happy at celebrities&#8217; success when you know them personally &#8211; like Caleb Burhans, <a href="https://createquity.com/2008/10/some-thoughts-while-wishing-election.html">previously mentioned</a> on this blog, who <a href="http://www.newmusicbox.org/article.nmbx?id=6055">has won the $153,000 Annenberg Prize</a>.)</li>
<li>Via the <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/nonprofit/2009/06/exempt-charities-or-vacation-spots.html">Nonprofit Law Blog</a>, Iowa bar and club owners are complaining that the River Music Experience, a nonprofit organization, <a href="http://www.qctimes.com/article_c33c3ea2-5634-11de-a597-001cc4c002e0.html?mode=story">represents unfair competition</a>. Meanwhile, this excellent Jody Dalton series on the <a href="http://www.newmusicbox.org/article.nmbx?id=6063">contemporary classical recording industry</a> reveals that the vast majority of commercial record labels specializing in this music (and most of them are, in fact, for-profit companies) are either a) subsidized by the artists, b) made possible by family wealth, or c) both.</li>
<li>Not to <a href="https://createquity.com/2008/01/economics-myths.html">beat a dead horse</a>, but Stanford professor Jeffrey Pfeffer <a href="http://blogs.bnet.com/ceo/?p=2466">lays waste</a> to the &#8220;efficient markets&#8221; hypothesis here.</li>
<li>Google Chrome personnel took a camera out into the streets of New York and found that most people don&#8217;t even know what a browser is, much less have heard of Google Chrome. MaryAnn Devine susses out the <a href="http://maryanndevine.typepad.com/smartsandculture/2009/07/what-arts-patrons-really-think.html">implications for arts marketers</a>.</li>
<li>Rosetta Thurman busts out a <a href="http://rosettathurman.com/blog/2009/07/what-does-the-future-hold-for-nonprofit-infrastructure-organizations/">great post</a> on nonprofit service organizations, really digging into the potential conflict between generating earned revenue (there&#8217;s that sustainability thing, again) and serving their constituency. I think this is a huge issue and Rosetta does a wonderful job tackling it.</li>
<li>Guess those creative economy initatives don&#8217;t always work out for everyone: Hollywood is <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-fi-ct-runaway12-2009jul12,0,407150.story?track=rss">feeling the pinch</a> from film companies looking for cheaper opportunities elsewhere.</li>
<li>Michael Kaiser weighs in on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-kaiser/needed-a-federal-arts-pol_b_226041.html">federal arts policy</a>, just before starting a <a href="http://www.artsincrisis.org/press_release/090603MMKtour.pdf">50-state tour</a> as part of the Arts in Crisis initiative, calling for more coordination between agencies and departments. Judith H. Dobrzynksi was at the White House press conference introducing new arts liaison Kal Penn, the man to whom part of this responsibility might fall, and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/realcleararts/2009/07/white-house-arts-news.html">lived to tell the tale</a>.</li>
<li>The NEA is finally out with the stimulus grants, and the Art21 blog has analysis <a href="http://blog.art21.org/2009/07/08/arts-stimulus-funding-pt-1/">here</a> and <a href="http://blog.art21.org/2009/07/09/arts-stimulus-pt-2-house-art-caucus-cochairs/">here</a>.</li>
<li>Oops, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/arts/music/13arts-JAZZTIMESWIL_BRF.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">never mind</a>: Looks like <span style="font-style: italic;">Jazz Times</span> will march on after all, and Shepard Fairey is <a href="http://www.wbur.org/2009/07/10/shepard-interview">guilty of vandalism</a> (but only on a couple of counts).</li>
<li><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/diacritical/2009/07/a-future-for-journalism-about.html">Do you know what the future of arts journalism holds</a>? Doug McLennan wants to talk to you.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://createquity.com/2009/07/around-horn-sotomayor-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
